Story by JAGER CHYNOWETH

Utah is known for its surreal landscapes and access to outdoor activities. What many wouldn’t know is that the Beehive State is emerging as a prominent music scene, especially for hip-hop artists.

For years, Utah’s culture and the hip-hop scene were at opposite ends of the spectrum. This has proved to be a difficult hump for Utah emcees and producers to overcome. But technology is helping to raise the profile of the local music scene.

As advancements in technology continue to increase, it is not so far-fetched that even Utah could become a big name in music. But it also poses the risk of a glut of artists vying for listeners’ attention.

Chandler Paulson, a local producer known as Channy P, credits technology for helping him become an emerging producer.

At 14, his introduction to music creation started when he and his little brother were given a $100 gift certificate for Christmas. They decided to spend it on a music-making software called Mixcraft.

With this software, he was able to transform from a high school freshman with no musical background to a college senior who has begun producing and making beats for a large number of different rappers and singers in Utah.

“Tech advancement has given me the tools to learn the different components and aspects necessary to compose sounds that are sonically pleasing, without the hassle of learning to play instruments,” he said.

In turn, this allowed him to fast-track his knowledge of music theory. Technology has generated a new way for producers to read music by adding shortcuts with preset chords and progressions that are built into the software itself. This informed Channy P on how professional quality music should sound and be created.

Music making programs have become an essential piece in creating quality music regardless of someone’s knowledge of music. Channy P says that all digital audio workstations, or DAW, like FL Studio, Pro Tools, Logic Pro and Ableton, are the starting point for making music today. He insists that meeting and working with other producers benefits each other as they watch and learn how someone else operates their DAW and makes music.

The current producer scene is not large, but it is quickly growing. Channy P said that a lot of rappers, bands and musicians in Utah are now turning to local producers who understand the components needed to build a song, to learn how to make higher quality sounding music.

With the continuance of emerging music technology, schools like Salt Lake DJ and Production, or SLDP, have created courses which teach you how to maneuver a DAW. Another local producer, Mad$haw, who works closely with Channy P, is a product of these classes.

For Mad$haw it all started with a music foundation class in March 2017. After four months in the course, he accelerated to an advanced class which taught him how make music using the software Ableton. After finishing the six-month course, Mad$haw enrolled in a weekly advanced mastering class. Before taking this class he had no musical involvement.

“With music technology advancing it has given someone like me, with little musical background, the ability to quickly learn how to make music,” Mad$haw said.

The course taught him how to make, mix and master beats. Although he is still learning music theory, he is able to compose his own melodies and chord progressions using Ableton with no issues. He insists that there would be no way for him to jump into a music career so late in life if it was not for this technology.

Even though advancements in musical technology have lowered the bar for making music, it has also led an oversaturated music scene. Channy P says that the biggest problem is that anyone thinks they can produce or be an artist without actually putting in the time to learn and understand how music is really made. Also, there are free music streaming services available that make it easier to release new songs.

Videos posted to Youtube also teach people how to mimic certain sounds that were created by popular producers, which has diluted some producers creative edge.

“An authentic producer understands the music making components regardless of what genre or sound he or she is trying to achieve,” Channy P said. “Hip hop is becoming extremely saturated and it is even harder to find good producers who know the correct terminology and have an understanding of music theory in general.”

Although oversaturation could be a looming problem for Hip hop, Channy P is grateful for streaming services like SoundCloud to promote his own music. He’s obviously not alone.

“SoundCloud has grasped the attention of today’s youth making it a gateway for artists like me to display my art and gain a fan base quickly,” said local rapper Madgi.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Story by RYAN FINLAYSON

Implementation of the new risk assessment tool at county jails statewide will begin in May 2018. The Utah Supreme Court ruling allows judges to use a statewide risk assessment tool to determine if a person who has been recently arrested can be released from custody with the use of the Utah Human Service Code. As a society, we forget the people who will be impacted by certain laws and procedures. Collectively our society assumes the current system is working correctly. Unforeseen consequences can affect a person after their incarceration such as losing their occupation, car and housing. The current system favors the wealthy and deems someone’s guilt before the trial begins. The current protocol of determining if a person is eligible to be released from state custody in Utah is changing.

The practice of bail bonds provides those that can afford the bail amount a fair shake in trial. If that person is unable to acquire the funds, then they must stay in jail while fighting a criminal charge. Dylan Johnson has had his due process taken from him, because of his inability to pay his bail bond, according to his attorney. He lost his home, occupation and car because of being incarcerated until he was able to appear in front of a judge. After his incarceration he was placed on state supervision and his probation officer issued him a violation for not having an occupation. Once he received the violation, he received a jail sentence and lost his opportunity for employment. This failure in the judicial system has created a vicious cycle that has taken control of Johnson’s life for nearly a decade.

Johnson’s perspective on the bail bond system is negative, he states “The process doesn’t consider other factors that needs to be examined during the determination of an individual’s release from custody. The determination of an individual’s release from incarceration shouldn’t be based on a monetary criterion”. Johnson prides himself in the man he is today stating “I strive to make every day to be better than my last.” The current system allows an individual that has been charged with murder the ability to be released from custody that same day, but those with minor offenses who lack the bail amount will remain in custody.

Implementation of the new risk assessment tool will help judges weigh the decision of whether an individual accused of a crime should remain in jail. June 2017 Chief Justice Matthew Durant gave his opinion to represent the concurring decision of the Utah Supreme Court, despite objections from Utah lawmakers. Utah lawmakers objected to the judicial ruling by emphasizing the damage to the bail bond industry and the potential to release violent criminals.

Advocates for the new risk assessment tool have argued that the current bail bond policy only allows due process to those who can afford the bail amount. The new risk assessment tool provides Utah judges more information to decide on an individual’s eligibility for release. The risk assessment focuses on nine variables used to determine the conditions of release are met. These include an individual’s age at the current arrest, current violent offenses, pending charges at the time of the current offense, prior misdemeanor convictions, prior felony convictions, prior violent conviction, prior failure to appear at pretrial in the past two years, and prior failure to appear at pretrial dating older than two years. The listed variables provide Utah judges information to determine whether an individual’s release from state custody is a public concern, or the possibility the individual will not appear at their pre-trial hearing.

Durrant noted while ruling in favor of the Utah Human Service Code “The clear consensus of those without financial stake is that reliance on monetary conditions of release should be reduced, and that validated risk information should be provided to judges”

The risk assessment tool includes a series of possible conditions while being released such as drug testing and ankle monitor. Bail can currently be implemented to ensure the defendant’s appearance at their trial by paying a smaller bond to a bail bondsman or can be issued cash only bail depending on the presiding judge’s discretion. The bail bond industry’s practices have placed a value on freedom that some citizens simply can’t afford. A bail bond places a dollar amount to be paid before being release from jail based on the crime charged by the defendant.

In October 2017 state Senate President Wayne L. Niederhauser and House Speaker Gregory H. Hughes sent letters to Durrant expressing policy issues, emphasizing that other states which have implemented similar risk assessment tools have done so by passing laws, not through the courts. The Utah Supreme Court upheld previous rulings on the new statewide policy involving the release of defendants that were recently arrested from state custody using a new risk assessment tool. Utah’s legislative branch  cries foul over the Supreme Court ruling.

Ryan Finlayson

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Continue reading →

Utah Department of Public Safety, other organizations focus efforts on making up for lost time as House Bill 200 aims to help prevent future backlogs 

Story by MALLORY BELL

While Salt Lake City has taken the lead in Utah to clear its backlog of untested rape kits, the rest of the state has a lot of catching up to do.

As part of a nationwide effort to improve sexual assault investigations by gathering and analyzing crime evidence and other data, Utah launched an initiative in October 2017 to tackle the issue.

Despite funding from New York City’s District Attorney’s Office to help start the program, Utah still lags far behind other states in testing rape kits for DNA evidence.

The process of testing a rape kits DNA evidence takes up to two years for non-priority cases in Utah, while other states can complete the process within 30 days.

Up to this point, Utah as a state has received three grants for the initiative. One from the district attorney office in New York, and the other two from the nationwide Sexual Assault Kit Initiative, or SAKI, program. The plan is to now request another SAKI fund and see how quickly and efficiently agencies in the state can complete the backlogged kits. The Utah Department of Public Safety is in charge of helping all agencies across the state complete the process correctly.

SAKI is a nationally acknowledged project beginning with New York District Attorney’s office back in 2003. New York decided to then distribute the remaining funds throughout the nation.

Since the project’s beginning in Utah, the Department of Public Safety along with Utah law enforcement have been able to send thousands of kits to private crime labs to expedite the process. The initiative is moving forward in the Salt Lake County, and now officials are trying to help the rest of Utah get up to speed. 

“Not all agencies in Utah have currently submitted all of their backlogged kits so far,”said Lauren DeVries, victim advocate for the Utah Department of Public Safety. “We actually have to do an inventory of the entire state to see how many kits each agency has.” 

DeVries said there are 2,200 kits that have currently been submitted and a total 2,700 kits throughout the state of Utah. To test the remaining 500 kits they first need to be located, and accounted for, which requires training, new guidelines and additional employees — all of which calls for more time and funds. The Utah Department of Public Safety hopes to receive a grant that will cover the majority of costs for the remainder of the project.

In the past, the kits and evidence of a sexual assault case were not viewed as important in solving the crime. The physical gathering of evidence became obsolete as the  testimonies of the perpetrator and victim were often not consistent, causing these cases to be ignored. Nonconsensual contact can be difficult to determine, meaning these cases were not pursued for practical reasons.

“There have been a lot of kits that have been destroyed,” DeVries said, explaining that if police thought the case wouldn’t be prosecuted they’d throw them out to make room for other evidence. “There is value in submitting these kits, and I don’t think we realized the value in it, until recently.” 

Now that the backlog testing is mostly completed, the state is looking for ways to implement major improvements into how sexual assault is investigated.

Changes in police departments have been mandated to ensure that the the kits are consistently being tested to prevent future backlog. Changes include law-enforcement training, and putting new processes in place for the victims’ rights and kit testing. House Bill 200, which goes into effect on July 1, will require every kit to be tested within a specified amount of time. It will also allow the victim to track their kit and be informed of each step of the testing.

State Senator Todd Weiler, R-Bountiful who sponsored the Senate version of House Bill 200, described the law as “a way that the state can show that we care about domestic violence, we care about sexual assault. … The victims that do come forward will be treated with respect and taken seriously.”

Current amendments aim to avoid future backlogs and problems with the kits. Lawmakers like Weiler want victims to feel like they are being heard and ultimately see justice through the use of collected evidence.

Utah Coalition Against Sexual Assault have been involved with SAKI along the way and have played a big part in writing the bill.

Turner Bitton, executive director of the Utah Coalition Against Sexual Assault, is excited about the bill and the partnership it brings.

“I think one of the most important pieces of House Bill 200 was that it provided new resources to law enforcement,” he said. “Law enforcement in many cases have been leaders in this work to move SAKI forward.”

Limited funds in the past presented various issues, such as understaffing of specialists who process assault kits, and training for current employees, which contributed to the backlog. Kits collected before 2018 have been sent directly to a private crime lab which has increased both process efficiency and fund expenditures.

With the passage of House Bill 119 and House Bill 200 crime labs have seen an increase in funding that law enforcement and crime labs receive.

“It was actually a two- to three-year effort to get more funding to hire more of the forensic scientists who actually go through and do the testing on the rape kits. We’ve also opened a new crime lab with more space,” Weiler said. “We just needed more warm bodies of qualified people to actually do the testing of the kits.”

The Department of Public Safety, Utah Coalition Against Sexual Assault and the Utah State Senate all hope that these changes will help victims see that concerted efforts are being made with their individual cases. Officials also want it known that change is coming to help future cases.

“I don’t know that things will change over night with this bill taking effect in July, but what I would say is, this is the final piece of funding that we needed, to guarantee that moving forward all of the backlog of rape kits will be wiped out and that they will be tested in a timely manner in the future,” Weiler said.

For more information on the Sexual Assault Kit Initiative, please visit:

https://publicsafety.utah.gov/sexual-assault-kit-initiative-saki/

Victims that are looking for help and resources can turn to UCASA and find details at

UCASA.org/resources

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Reflection

When choosing a topic for my enterprise story I looked at all the things I enjoyed doing and took a deeper look into some of the important issues facing them. One of the larger issues here in Utah has to do with land management and the reduction of public lands. I had previously heard that a large trade show that showcases all the different activities I enjoy chose to leave Utah due to their poor decisions surrounding their land. I chose this as my topic and researched further the impacts that the show leaving might have on Utah and the people who spend their time in the outdoors.

To get sources for this story I looked at all the different people and businesses that were very vocal of their discontent toward Utah’s decisions. I then chose a few of them and reached out to individuals within the companies. I also looked to some professors at the U that had some insights on the economic impacts of the leave and what that might entail. I ran into some issues when contacting sources but simply due to the fact that most of who I reached out to never actually responded. I was contacting businesses that were not located in Utah and people who worked out of state so it was impossible for me to be pushy and visit them face to face to get an interview. I did, however, get some interviews and it worked out in the end.

The overall writing process was another challenge for me due to the fact I was learning a whole new style of writing and I had to write in a way that sounded natural. I have always written in an essay format and never had to change so it was definitely challenging for me to get comfortable with the new writing style. Overall I think being the first news story I have done I think it went fairly well. I definitely have some things to do differently in the future but it was a good learning experience.

Bio

Luke Fortune is currently a student at the University of Utah studying Strategic Communications with a minor in Business. Luke is 21 years old and he is in his third year of college with plans to graduate in May 2019.

April 17, 2018

Women in STEM underrepresented in Utah but begin to rise in the field

By Kara D. Rhodes

SALT LAKE CITY- Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics (STEM) has generally been a place for males in the past but the in recent years females have started to make a change. Utah women are on the rise at the local Universities and STEM related jobs.

The rise of women in these fields is becoming more noticable but has yet to become equal with men in STEM. According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, men filled 76 percent of STEM jobs while women are at 24 percent as of 2017. Women are 47 percent of the workforce and only 24 percent of them are in STEM related fields. Throughout early education and following into the ACT male and females are head to head. Half of high school graduates showed interest in STEM majors and careers. 

A recent update in 2017 gave the same information in this figure.

Cambria Hobbs

Cambria Hobbs, a Utah native who works for a software company, feels she is less likely to be taken seriously than her male colleagues. “There is a very masculine expectation for the way we approach our work, and every day it’s a battle for me to prove that there is another way it can be done.” Hobbes says the gender gap is closing slowly in STEM and she encourages more women to study or work in field. “Women have so much to offer in these fields and we need each other to break through these gender barriers that a lot of people don’t even think exist,” she says.

Gender discrimination is something most women face on a daily basis. A study shows that a science faculty rated material from applications of their students without knowing who was male or female but assigned different names from their actual sex. The materials did not differ from applicant both male and females had the same qualifications. Members of this faculty rated male applicants higher than their female counterparts as more qualified for that job position. The sex of the faculty did not waver the reponses men and women both voted the same. Further analysis showed that the female students were less likely to be hired for that position. The results of this particular study show that it was culture that played the biggest role in how faculty chose males for the job. 

University of Utah.

Kelsy Rhodes, a Math/Statistics major at Utah State University, has yet to step into the STEM workplace but has experience in the classroom. Rhodes has not encountered any gender bias in the classroom setting but would love to see more women in STEM positions at her school such as, Science Senator, research positions, SI instructors, and TA’s. When asked if she believed the gender gap was closing, Kelsy stated, “I think that more women are choosing to study STEM majors, but that they are still predominantly male.” She believes this is because women may be afraid to step into an area that they believe they’ll be less accepted. Kelsy, like Cambria, encourages women to study STEM because “There’s an irrational stigma that men can handle the course load and long study hours, but many women feel it might not work out for them. If a female is interested in the subject and works hard then they are fully qualified and prepared to get a STEM degree.”  

Kelsy Rhodes.

Influences by society have a significant role in the way women view STEM-related fields. There are many things being done to close the gender gap. Starting with students in lower grade schools. Girls in 4th-8th grade can participate in an annual “Girl Start” conference that offers discovery of STEM related careers. “The SciGirls Seven” is a PBS television show that encourages girls to join STEM. Early exposure seems to be the best pathway in showing young girls that STEM is a field that they can participate in as well as enjoy. Utah has a local STEM action center and its mission statement is, “The STEM Action Center is Utah’s leader in promoting science, technology, engineering and math through best practices in education to ensure connection with industry and Utah’s long-term economic prosperity.” Its website has multiple sources for those females who are interested in more information on STEM.

Zane Yarbrough.

Zane Yarbrough, a computer-engineering and physics major at the University of Utah. Zane stated, “As a male in STEM I fully recognize a gender gap in STEM majors.” He believes that the gap is slowly starting to shrink because stereotypes are starting to be ignored. What once was a masculine set of majors and jobs is now becoming something that anyone can do.

“Gender roles are being thrown out the door,” he says, insisting that anyone interested in STEM should study it, regardless of their gender.

4/10/2018 University of Utah.

11/10/2018 Salt Lake City, UT.

2/3/2017. Salt Lake City, Utah

3/20/2017 Portland, OR.

Reflection: The Future of Capital Punishment in Utah

By Spencer Buchanan

LinkedIn: Spencer Buchanan

My story regarding the death penalty was inspired by the recent a bill introduced in the Utah Legislature to repeal the death penalty. Given the historically staunch position, those on the Right take on the position I found it interesting. Two of the sources I came about came with the help of Professor Whisenant and his connections. The other two, I found from searching around campus. Professor Burbank from the Political Science and Nicholas Colemen, the President of the Utah College Republicans gave me the interesting dynamic of conservatives regarding capital punishment. The momentum behind the efforts to repeal the death penalty in Utah come from position changes within the Republican Party. Both Colemen and Burbank’s comments on the matter gave both a professional and personal insight into the matter.

Developing this came with relative ease due to the already expansive reporting and research was already done on this topic. The debate regarding capital punishment has been long fought and there is much in data and reports dating back several years. What I really wanted to focus on the changing views on it. For most the history of capital punishment, Republicans and conservatives had been strongly for it and Democrats have usually been against it. I read research as to what could explain the steep decline in support for the policy across the board and more specifically with conservatives. My aforementioned interviews with Coleman and Burbank gave this explanation.

From this experience, I have learned that you need a lot of facts, knowledge, and original sourcing to make a good story. Of the facts and interviews you do, only about 20 percent of what you do and find is used. Professor Burbank, when I met with him, gave a lot of information regarding the history, and other factors that play into the support or opposition to the death penalty but I to widdle at he had given to find what works best for the story.

University of Utah students voice their opinion on Bears Ears

By Courtney Ruttan 

April 17, 2018

    The inspiration for this story came from my passion for protecting and preserving the Earth. I was personally offended when I heard the possibility of the Bears Ears Monument shrinking. I wanted to gain more knowledge and do research on exactly what this was going to effect. Having grown up in Utah, I am so proud of all of the beauty this state has to offer.

    I wanted to focus my story on what students at the University of Utah had to say on the matter being protests broke out on campus. I was interested to see the passion that students had for the issue ranging from both sides of the issue but mainly on protecting the land.

    During the writing process, my sorry initially was a great editorial article that was very story based. I learned that this story needed to be filled with facts and evidence for my claims. It wasn’t until then that my story gained focus. I tailored my story towards the reasoning and effects shrinking Bears Ears would have. I also tried to keep my story focused on what is going on currently with the issue.

    I was surprised when I discovered several people were upset when President Obama made an executive order to protect all of the Bears Ears land. I later found out that executive orders typically have a short longevity.

    I decided to use the interviews from Hess, Hughes, and Christensen because they were able to speak the most on the topic and were educated on the issue. Each was confident in their opinion and where they stand. Christensen and Hess have both traveled to the Bears Ears Monument and were able to enjoy everything it has to offer.

    I am very happy I was able to write an article on this topic because it is very controversial in Utah. I will be interested to see if the monuments land does, in fact, decrease.

Linkedin: Courtney Ruttan     

The Future of Capital Punishment in Utah

By Spencer Buchanan

Salt Lake City–In Utah’s 63rd Legislature an effort by Rep. Gage Froerer, R-Huntsville, sponsored HB379, a bill that would prohibit Utah prosecutors from seeking the death penalty after May 8, 2018. Effectively, it would end the use of capital punishment in the state.
“What’s interesting is that this debate is being pushed by Republicans, by conservatives. Whereas before it was an issue you didn’t discuss. This has opened the debate in many conservative states,” stated Professor Matthew Burbank of the University of Utah Political Science Department.
Professor Burbank elaborated on the debate and the changing public support for capital punishment. “We have two particular reasons for the change. One, a number of high profile cases, with DNA particularly, have led to a number of exonerations. Those have struck people.”
Since 1973 there have been more 155 exonerations nationwide according to the Death Penalty Information Center.
One of the most recent exonerations, reported by the Chicago Tribune, was former Illinois death-row inmate Gabriel Solanche, who prosecutors dropped their charges after Circuit Court Judge James Obbish overturned his conviction, finding that disgraced Chicago detective Reynaldo Guevara had lied under oath when he testified.
According to Burbank though, what has really moved the discussion regarding death penalty to the forefront has been the changing the attitudes of conservatives. “There has been a change in conservatives as to judicial practices, like mandatory sentencing, like the death penalty and it’s cost to benefit.”
A recent study prepared for the Oklahoma Death Penalty Review Commission found that seeking the death penalty in Oklahoma “incurs significantly more time, effort, and costs on average, as compared to when the death penalty is not sought in first-degree murder cases.”
The study which was prepared by Seattle University criminal justice professors Peter A. Collins and Matthew J. Hickman and law professor Robert C. Boruchowitz. The study reviewed 15 state studies of the death penalty found seeking the death penalty imposes an average of approximately $700,000 more in case-level costs than not seeking capital punishment.
According to the Salt Tribune, Utah’s own legislative analysts in 2012 estimated that a death sentencing and years of appeals cost $1.6 million more than a life-without-parole sentence. Another recent report estimated that Utah and its counties have spent almost $40 million to prosecute the 165 death-penalty-eligible cases that have been filed in the past two decades. Only two cases in that time have resulted in a death sentence.
The ability for states to actually execute prisoners has become difficult. Lethal injection has been the primary method in recent decades and is regarded as the most humane form of execution. In 2016 however, Pfizer joined over 20 American and European pharmaceutical manufacturers that had previously blocked the sale of their drugs for use in lethal injections, effectively closing the open market for FDA-approved manufacturers for lethal execution drugs.
Shifting public opinion also shows that support for the death penalty has waned greatly. According to the Pew Research Center, half of Americans (49 percent) now favor the death penalty for people convicted of murder, while 42 percent oppose it. Public support for capital punishment peaked in the mid-1990s when eight-in-ten Americans (80 percent in 1994) favored the death penalty and fewer than two-in-ten were opposed (16 percent). Opposition to the death penalty is now the highest it has been since 1972.
These practical obstacles to implementing a death sentence have shifted many of those on Right.
Nicholas Coleman, President of the Utah College Republicans, stated that younger conservatives his age seem to match the larger group and has seen the debate regarding the practicality of the death penalty in his organization.
“There are more than just a few. The thought is usually based on fiscal conservatism.” Coleman stated. He expanded saying the price to litigate a death sentence and the cost to house death-row inmates are often cited as reasons behind some conservatives’ desire to do away the death penalty.
Salt Lake County Mayor Ben McAdams, who served in the Utah Senate as a Democrat from 2009 to 2012, has watched with interest has noticed the shift among the Republicans and Conservatives he knows and works with. McAdams noted that he sees a general mistrust of government competency beyond conservatives as well that has played into this debate being opened up.
“It has been interesting to see the debate on both about how this might go.” McAdams said “As I speak to many of them, it’s more a reflection of a distrust of government. Government gets it wrong.”
Support for the death penalty though is still majority opinion among Republicans as of 2016 with 72 percent of still in support of the sentence according to Pew Research. Support is the lowest among Democrats at 34 percent while Independent support is 44 percent.
If trends continue in the same decline that has been seen the past couple decades, capital punishment may soon be a sentence of the past. And for conservatives states like Utah, it’ll be the upcoming voters and dynamic lawmakers to see that change.

Reflection on Story

LinkedIn: Spencer Buchanan

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Born and raised in Utah, Hunter Wallin is highly adaptable. With hard working characteristics, and a positive attitude he has accumulated many talents and skills. Currently attending the University of Utah, soon finishing up his Strategic Communications degree, Hunter has worked his way through college while still working full time as a warehouse manager at local company called RotoPax. Hunter is set to graduate from the U of U in the fall of 2018 and sets out to start his own future businesses.

My LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/hunter-wallin-bb51b7139/

University of Utah Meal Plan Story:   https://unewswriting.wordpress.com/2018/04/17/university-of-utah-required-meal-plans/

Reflection Blog:https://wordpress.com/post/unewswriting.wordpress.com/8612